FPX Nickel posts positive Baptiste Project PEA

Share this article

FPX Nickel Corp. [FPX-TSXV; FPOCF-OTC] has received positive results from the 2020 preliminary economic assessment (PEA) for the Baptiste Project at its wholly-owned Decar nickel district 80 km north of Fort St. James, central British Columbia. The PEA was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 standards by BBA Inc. of Montreal, Canada, with work on mine planning and tailings by Stantec Inc. of Vancouver, Canada.

Production and economic highlights

Mine life of 35 years and after-tax payback of 4.0 years;

After-tax net present value (NPV) (8%) of US$1.72-billion and internal rate of return (IRR) of 18.3%;

Average nickel production of 99 million pounds per year;

Average C1 operating costs of US$2.74 per pound nickel and all-in sustaining costs (AISC) of US$3.12 per lb nickel;

Average US$481-million of annual earnings before royalties, taxes and depreciation.

“This PEA establishes Baptiste as a premier large-scale nickel project,” commented FPX Nickel’s President and CEO, Martin Turenne. “The project has the potential to be a significant global nickel operation, with a multigenerational operating life and average annual production of 99 million pounds of contained nickel. Baptiste’s enormous scale, combined with low C1 operating costs of US$2.74 per lb, has the potential to deliver robust operating margins throughout the nickel price cycle, generating average earnings (before royalties, taxes and depreciation) of US$481-million per year and an after-tax NPV of US$1.7-billion. With its proximity to zero-carbon hydroelectric power, the fact that its nickel product can bypass smelters for direct sale to end-users, and the carbon-absorbing properties of Baptiste host rock, the project is well positioned to address the growing market demand for environmentally sustainable nickel production.”


Resource World Magazine Inc. has prepared this editorial for general information purposes only and should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell securities in the companies discussed herein. The information provided has been derived from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed. This editorial does not take into account the readers investment criteria, investment expertise, financial condition, or financial goals of individual recipients and other concerns such as jurisdictional and/or legal restrictions that may exist for certain persons. Recipients should rely on their own due diligence and seek their own professional advice before investing.

Share this article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×